Jeremy Bentham's Influence on the Legal Justice Program: Past and Present
The delivery of punishment has changed drastically over the centuries. Up until the 19th 100 years in England, imprisonment was not viewed as a punishment, it was simply used as the offender waited to be sentenced to their вЂreal' punishment (Bull, 2010; Hirst, 1998). Corporal punishment such as flogging, branding and traumatisme, death by hanging, and transportation to other continents such as America and Down under were common punitive actions through the age ranges, until very well into the 1800's (Newburn, 2003). Although these types of extreme penalties are no longer suitable or practised by lawbreaker courts in britain or Sydney, in some ways, earlier times has molded delivery of sanction currently. In fact , Sydney was founded with Britain's purpose to send their particular worst felony there (Jackson, 1998). Theorist Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) was particularly important to the cessation of the controversial tactic of transportation to Australia, and catalysed the beginning of the modern day prison systems (Bull, 2010). Bentham was obviously a philosopher whom rigorously compared the travel of convicts to different continents (Bentham, 1789). He had strong ideals relating to bad guys and the easiest way for them to always be punished. Building the criminological theory of Utilitarianism, Bentham argued that incapacitation, rehab and prevention were the three pillars important to fighting criminal offense (Hopkins Burke, 2011). During this essay, Bentham's beliefs on punishment and the reasons why he opposed transportation will be discussed. Furthermore, an study of Bentham's specific contribution to the end of transportation as well as the continued affect his suggestions have had in shaping the contemporary consequence practises will probably be conducted. Bentham's understanding of crime and crooks was simple. His point of view classed persons as realistic beings, in whose behaviour can be...
References: Bentham, J. (1789). Punishment and deterrence. In A. von Hirsch & A. Ashworth (Eds., 1998), Principled sentencing: psychic readings on theory and plan (2nd impotence. ). 53-57. Oxford: Scharf Publishing.
Half truths, M. (2010). Punishment & sentencing: Risk, rehabilitation and restitution. Oxford University Press: South Melbourne.
Hopkins Burke, R. (2011). Criminal Rights Theory: An Introduction. New York: Taylor swift and Francis.
Hirst, L. (1998). The Australian experience: the convict colony. In M. Morris & G. Rothman (Eds. ), The Oxford Good the Prison, 262-295. Oxford: Oxford University or college Press.
Hudson, B. (2003). Understanding proper rights: An introduction to ideas, perspectives and controversies in contemporary penal theory. Buckingham: Wide open University Press.
Jackson, 3rd there’s r. V. (1998). Jeremy Bentham and the Nsw convicts. International Journal of Social Economics, 25, 370-379.
Newburn, T. (2003). The introduction of the contemporary penal program. In Crime and Criminal Justice Policy (2nd education. ) 4-17. Pearson Education Ltd. В
Semple, M. (1993). Bentham's Prison: A report of the Panopticon Penitentiary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Vold, G. & Bernard, T. (1985). Classical criminology. In Theoretical criminology (3rd Ed. ) (pp. 18-35). New York: Oxford University Press.
Von Hirsch, A
Von Hirsch, A. (1998). " Rules and orderвЂќ. In A. vonseiten Hirsch & A. Ashworth (Eds. ), Principled sentencing: readings on theory and policy (2nd ed. ). 53-57. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
White, 3rd there’s r., Haines, Farrenheit., & Asquith, N. (2012). Crime & Criminology. Melbourne: Oxford College or university Press.